AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Dxo photolab show jpeg12/15/2023 ![]() ![]() I don’t need a DAM for photos but I am looking at it for a DAM application as it supports Office, PDF, MP3 and all other files. Currently on sale in Dec for 25% off, if anyone is contemplating a Christmas present for themselves There are several options but one of the most popular is IMATCH. You’ll notice this when you first attempt to open a file, as you’ll be prompted to. So all you have to do is open something to begin seeing improvements to noise and sharpness. ![]() This separates the DAM and raw converter functionality which means changing raw converters becomes a minor factor. Every image that is opened into DxO PhotoLab 2 is immediately optimised to correct for inherent imperfections in the lens and sensor. This is one of the drawbacks of using a combined raw converter and DAM, you are effectively locked in.Īs a general comment this applies to anyone using a combined raw converter/DAM program.įor people who a DAM is vital (not most DXO users as it doesn’t have DAM functionality) it might be worth considering using dedicated DAM software. If the DAM is vital for you then unfortunately DXO, although it has a Photolibrary option, it is not a DAM and you need to stay with LR. So whether you are using LR or DXO as soon as you produce a RGB file you have to deal with the same sized files. I thought it did when you mentioned PS having two options but thought I had better check before posting as it is counter-intuitive Tif compression doesn’t do much for you and the LZW option actually increases file size. I downloaded a Sony a7Riv file just to understand the file sizes.Ĭonverted with Adobe DNG converter - 45Mb ![]() Once you start using options then this breaks compatibility with other software. So I’m on a trial with DxO PhotoLab and it gives a much cleaner and sharper RAW file, much better than Lightroom, but when I export to a JPEG with settings I use for Facebook the images look blurred. As we've said before (April 2008), and the Pop Photo Lab confirms. As Adobe invented DNG they can do what they like and all Adobe software will be able to read them. Tested as Highest-quality JPEGs at default setting - 1. DXO can work with these files as long as they support the camera that produced the original raws and they are standard conversions to DNG. When you convert files in LR to DNG they are still raw files, the same as if you used Adobe DNG converter. It is possible to disable this suffix like for other exports? no compressing, embedding original raw, …)?Īnother thing I couldn’t find yet: When exporting to Lightroom PL4 always adds a Suffix “_DXO”. Is this normal or is there a bug in DNG creation (e.g. ORF file of 18MB it produces a DNG > 80MB.Īs a result I will need 5x the diskspace to store my files! (this is no problem for working, as HDs are getting bigger and bigger, but for archiving this big amount of data matters!) I’m testing the PL4 trial now and would like to buy it to integrate it into my Workflow with LR.īut I wonder why the DNG file size when exporting as DNG (Noise reduction… only with Lens sharpening activated) produces so big files. ISO setting by 1 to 2 steps with DeepPrime!Ĭurrently I am using LR (sorry) and PL4 can still not fit all my needs. I never got pictures with so much details and so little noise at all ISO levels. First I must say that DeepPrime is an amazing feature! It works perfect with the RAW files from my Olympus EM1ii and EM1iii. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |